Re: [A/S] Re: Update on Hunter's Trailer

On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 17:36 -0500, Terry Tyler wrote:

> Hey Kit,
>
> Your note was read 10 minutes before the following note came to my
> attention.
>
> http://www.naturalnews.com/032659_arsenic_chicken.html

Hey, I entirely agree that this whole soy etc exchange is way off-topic;
said so in my first response. However, I do feel obligated to respond
to medical misinformation.

So here goes again: Yes, arsenic in sufficient doses certainly is
carcinogenic; unfortunately, low concentrations of arsenic always have
been ubiquitous. And due to world-wide industrial activity during the
past 2 centuries, the concentrations have been increasing markedly.

While we do not know the minimum dose for this effect, it only makes
sense to avoid the stuff wherever possible. Not being a lion or tiger,
I don't eat cow - no problem. And since arsenic is not a nutritional
supplement, now I have a reason to avoid chicken.

But even a total vegetarian cannot avoid arsenic.

Peace,
- Lew #4239

__._,_.___

Messages in this topic (50)

Recent Activity:

• New Members 3
• New Photos 8

To unsubscribe from this group, go to http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/AirstreamList/ and unsubscribe. To suspend delivery while traveling, simply change the delivery option to No Mail-Web only.

This site is not sponsored by or affiliated in any way with Airstream Inc, Thor Inc, or the WBCCI.