My apologies if I came off riled, because I'm not. Like I said, I do appreciate the input. I've been involved in other groups and it's easy to get off track and never address the initial topic.
I would never condone or recommend someone undertake a dangerous project, and I honestly do think that with winter approaching, and the number of people with older equipment, that another thread addressing safety issues would be a good idea.
That is what I meant whether it was tactful or not. I am nothing of an expert, just an individual trying to understand the signals being given off by the universe around me. I was raised to believe that information is to be shared. Everyday I learn something new, and often what I learn is how wrong I've been about something to this point. I wish more people understood this.
My apologies if I offended anyone or compromised the rules of the group.
Certainly, everyone should have CO and Smoke Detectors. These are devices that can save lives and the cost of a detector far outweighs the dangers of not having one.
When someone quoted another as stating "the consequences of restoring something with a combustion chamber that is 39 years old are deadly" I felt compelled to point out the error there. It does create a bit of a conundrum though since it is hard to disagree without being disagreeable. Now, once again I have put my foot in it, haven't I?
Keep your Shiny sides up! :)
This site is not sponsored by or affiliated in any way with Airstream Inc, Thor Inc, or the WBCCI.
0 comments:
Post a Comment